The three remaining candidates for Humboldt County District Attorney covered a range of issues Tuesday night in Garberville, but a few points seemed to raise the temperature.
Both challengers to incumbent Paul Gallegos have been sharply critical over the years, but Allison Jackson appeared more inclined than fellow challenger Paul Hagen to confront the DA at Tuesday’s event. While Hagen gave direct answers to each question, Jackson seized every chance to verbally blast the DA.
To his credit, Gallegos seems to have mastered the art of the cool cucumber, addressing the crowd as “ladies and gentleman” a lot. Unlike debates of campaigns past, his feathers remained unruffled from the finger-pointing offered by Ms. Jackson.
CODE ENFORCEMENT
Gallegos maintains that he inherited a broken system when he took over the office in 2003, which gave him responsibility but no authority over the Code Enforcement Unit that famously went out of control during several 2007 raids. He said his worries became a reality when the brouhaha hit.
Jackson disagreed, and said the DA could have exercised authority if he’d bothered to find out he had administrative authority.
Coincidently, Gallegos’ campaign website features a supportive quote from Bonnie Blackberry of the Civil Liberties Monitoring Project which hosted a heated forum in Southern Humboldt at the time. Blackberry said she was “impressed with Paul’s swift and decisive intervention when the Code Enforcement Unit stepped out of bounds.”
ANIMAL CRUELTY
Gallegos said his office prosecutes animal abuse and cited a recent case involving a dog where he got a felony plea bargain. He said animal cruelty is offensive to him.
But Jackson blamed Gallegos for failing to charge such cases, one of which led to 61 dogs cannibalizing each other, she said. In another case she said wolf puppies languished in a cage for 6 months because Gallegos couldn’t decide how to charge the alleged offender. She called his record “deeply troubling.”
STAFFING
Gallegos said Humboldt County’s good retirement policy poses problems with staffing, but in-office training and a mentor program guide the newbies. He said staff works diligently to make the DA’s office of the future.
Jackson said the biggest complaint she’s received is lack of training and supervision of jr. deputies. She said there is no administration from the DA and that Gallegos said as much to reporter Daniel Mintz. The article quotes the DA thusly: “The people of this community deserve to see me in court – I’m not an administrator, they didn’t elect me to be an administrator, they elected me to make sure this office runs and it runs well.”
Despite the differences, Gallegos and Jackson had one thing in common — neither could name their top 3 donors. Gallegos said he doesn’t pay attention to the money because it’s the most disfavored part of a campaign, but added that he has a broad spectrum of support. Disclosure forms show he received $5000 from David Gallegos of Weston, FL and $500 each from the lawfirm of Zwerdling Dibble and Dr. Ken Miller.
Jackson said she has many contributions between $100 and $300 dollars, and that she has is endorsed by victims of crime. According to campaign disclosure forms her #1 donor is the Harland lawfirm where she is a partner. Next are a number of $500 donations from notables such as Barnum Timber, HumCPR chairman Lee Ulansey, Kramer Investment, Hilficker, Eureka Readymix, Don’s Rent-All.
The debate was broadcast on KMUD and can be heard in the archives. Blogger Eric Kirk summarized the debate after the closing statements, and said Paul Hagen may have felt like John Edwards in the final debates between himself, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton in 2008, by which he meant left out — not hiding a love child somewhere.


Very informative write up. Thanks from those of us who can’t take the time to watch all of these!
Glad you brought up the campaign finance component. I thought it odd that Gallegos was pretty much aloof to where his money is coming from. On Jackson’s side, I realized her answer was remarkably similar to Ryan Sundberg’s answer at the Fifth District forum when the same question was asked, just different dollar amounts yet similar donors. Not to suggest anything, but I thought it was worth noting.
And yes, the tactic of Jackson, and even more so Kathleen Bryson, was to attack Gallegos on his conduct as DA, or lack there of in certain cases. Gallegos seems to be playing it cool, focusing on his accomplishments while refusing to fall into a back-and-forth with JacksonIt may help or hurt him.
Hagen is just waiting it out while the T-Rexs duke it out.
i noticed in the sheriffs debate that Hislop was big on Ladies and Gentlemen since both candidates were prepped by the same Sacto. advisory group it is understandable.
How about that sheriff debate? Is it true (as Hislop repeated more than once) that a sergeant got paid over $200,000.00? WTF? And people are going all mental over Neely making 80 something? And there are apparently several others in the Sheriffs Department making over $100K? This is the story I’d like to see the Times-Standard cover.
Hislop was big on the “ladies and gentlemen” usage but unlike Gallegos was very aggressive in the debate. In fact he used the word “aggressive” repeatedly, as in he would aggressively go after grant money, etc.
So Hislop is aggressive about grant Money, how come he asked seniors to keep track of license plate numbers at a drug house then forgot to run them, left EPD without following up?
We found out much later they werent planning to do anything with the license plate list-they can only respond to immediate calls for service.
Do not misinform the public then drop the ball, I cannot vote for this idiot.
When we see law enforcement personnel (sheriffs, police, prison guards) making large incomes (say, over $100,000) it’s usually because of lots of overtime. When a public safety agency is understaffed, then they ask (or require) officers to work overtime. This can often be 20 hr a week or more, and at some point it’s paid as time-and-a-half or double time. This runs up the cost very quickly. Overtime is ALWAYS one of the budget busters for police forces.
If Mr. Hislop did his homework correctly he would of realized the person who made that amount of money obtained it when he “RETIRED!” He withdrew his retirement, which has to be claimed as income! Hislop is an idiot! Did anyone else hear last night what his personal goal if her were to become sheriff, ” I want to be the Sheriff of the Century!” Who says that???
Also, Go Allison Jackson! I can’t wait for your Cinco De Mayo Fundraiser in Fortuna!!!!!
Barnum Timber, HumCPR chairman Lee Ulansey, Kramer Investment, Hilficker, Eureka Readymix, Don’s Rent-All.
So why is Allison a developers wet dream?
What the radio audience missed that the live audience was a part of was the huge round of applause that Gallegos received after he rebutted Allison’s statement about code enforcement saying flat-out that she was, “making false statements.” Paul was very passionate and the people of southern Humboldt knew that he was telling the truth.
This isn’t the only thing AJ is making false statements about. She needs to check her facts before making such vicious allegations. Her scariness is seen inside and out.
Eric Kirk’s analogy about Edwards is very revealing. Hagen’s bastard child is the Shelter Cove resort improvement district.
I guess no one heard the response about the expired drivers license and that Gallegos would prosecute 1st time offenders with a misdemeanor.
Allison was quick to show that Gallegos lacks judgment, understanding of the law and prioritization.
You do not use court room time for a infraction or fix it ticket!
And…….. Gallegos has been well aware of the animal welfare movement and should know the Animal Cruelty Penal Codes inside out and backwards. Tethering a dog to a 215 grow to protect it is a Felony and considered animal abuse!
So basically the animal welfare community has to live in fear of being prosecuted for doing the DA and law enforcement’s job.
Hagen’s bastard child is the resort improvement district…HUH???
Here’s my prediction, guaranteed to be worth every penny you paid for it:
It will come down to Jackson vs. Gallegos in a runoff.
Gallegos will win.
Here’s my prediction. There are bus drivers in Humboldt, lifers stacking up overtime, who make more than the D.A.
Discuss amongst yourselves……
Why is Allison Jackson the developer’s candidate?
I’ll tell you why…remember the TPZ moratorium? Jackson, along with Bill Barnum, the attorney for the NorCal Homebuilders Assoc, was a champion of this nonsense about the legal interpretation of the comma or lack thereof in the state law limiting residential use of TPZ land, as in:
“Residence or other structure necessary for the management of timber.”
P4eople who want to build on every TPZ parcel and get their tax shelter are supporting:
Jackson
Sundberg
Bass
Rodoni
Just look at their donors at The Reporta: http://www.johncosborn.com/?page_id=756
hahah! Hagen’s bastard child might be Ken Bareilles’ 58 illegal subdivisions–didn’t that happen under Hagen’s watch too?
It’s hard to understand why so many enviros are supporting him.
Is not a big part of the D.A’s practice. So ranting about a D.A. as “the developer’s candidate” is
ridiculous. Now, if someone is “the grower’s candidate” or “the defense lawyer’s candidate” or “the parolee’s candidate”, that’s interesting.
From a sage SoHum voice:
http://www.redwoodtimes.com/ci_14967950?source=most_viewed
http://watchpaul.blogspot.com/p/plea-deals_20.html
Allison is going to win this election. It may happen in June, or it may happen in November–and the run-off election very well could be between Allison & Paul Hagen. At any rate, Paul Gallegos will not be re-elected this time. You won’t see his endorsement in the Times-Standard. It’s “a new day”. Life moves on.
Since when is a TS endorsement relevant?
Well, it feels relevant if it doesn’t go your way. It seems to reflect a consensus of the community. I do believe that most readers of the Times-Standard are informed people who also vote.