Home > City of Eureka, Linda Atkins > Quote of the Day

Quote of the Day

“Unlike some past council members, I don’t have the capacity to know what the people who are not communicating with me are thinking.” — Eureka City Councilwoman Linda Atkins in response to the July 22 op-ed by a vocal clique of critics.

  1. Who Cares
    July 30, 2011 at 9:57 am

    i have read this quote somewhere else before. that person was an idiot too! in the words of Biff ( Back to the Future ) “Think McFly, Think”!

  2. Ben
    July 30, 2011 at 10:15 am

    A clear statement that she is out of touch with most of Eureka.

  3. Anonymous
    July 30, 2011 at 10:17 am

    Linda has inserted her foot once again!

  4. 69er
    July 30, 2011 at 10:20 am

    Not Anonymous
    Linda has inserted her foot once again!

  5. July 30, 2011 at 10:27 am

    It seems that quote is way to deep for your readers, Heraldo. As is Linda Atkins, who demonstrably stands head and shoulders above most people running their vitriolic mouths in this community.

  6. Julie Timmons
    July 30, 2011 at 10:37 am

    What JB said. “Most of Eureka” doesn’t bother to vote. Hopefully, that will change.

  7. tra
    July 30, 2011 at 10:38 am

    Linda has inserted her foot once again!

    Looks to me like she applied her foot, swiftly and with great force, to the backsides of those who tried to silence her. You go girl!

  8. Goldie
    July 30, 2011 at 10:39 am

    Also from Linda’s letter: “It sometimes takes sustained communication to convince some elected officials that the public should not be ignored.” Linda’s letter was an invitation for citizens to continue to keep trying to communicate with the elected members of our city council. There is a responsibility in being a citizen just as there is in being an elected official.

  9. Plain Jane
    July 30, 2011 at 10:46 am

    I wish I could say I’m surprised that some people can’t understand such an elementary concept. To translate for them, it means she can’t read minds and only knows what the people want who actually communicate their ideas and desires to her. Politicians who run on a popular platform and then switch agendas after election, claiming a mandate that wasn’t mentioned during the election, are corrupt. In Wisconsin they are throwing the bums out of office who tried it.

  10. Auntie Arkley
    July 30, 2011 at 10:50 am

    The right-wingers have stuck their heads in their butts again.

  11. High Finance
    July 30, 2011 at 12:52 pm

    The comment by Linda Atkins is unbelievably childish & amateurish. I would expect it of some bloggers but Atkins is old enough to know better.

    She has alienated the entire city council and city manager AGAIN ! To be an effective city councilman means you have to have the maturity to understand that you want your foe on one issue to side with you on the next. You have to ask yourself does she want to accomplish anything at all or just get a tiny handful of left-wing Heraldo bloggers frothing at the mouth ?

  12. Plain Jane
    July 30, 2011 at 1:25 pm

    You are such a delusional fool, HiFi. You wish everyone would just go along to get along (so long as it is your agenda they are going along with) regardless what the people want. The current council changed their agenda after election and have done absolutely nothing to fulfill their promises. Linda has the guts to stand up to these Arkley / Chamber of Commerce sycophants and all your insults won’t change that. If Eureka had a true ward system, most of those bozos wouldn’t even be on the council.

  13. high as F!@#'n fi
    July 30, 2011 at 1:29 pm

    hi fi has inserted his head once again. It is clearly dark in that nether recess where he sticks his head during what passes as thinking for him.

    It is clear that the only people our city council member has to work with and for are those who elected her– the citizens of Eureka.

    this would be a good lesson for the four stooges (and the mayor makes five) to heed.

  14. High Finance
    July 30, 2011 at 1:43 pm

    PJ & 1.29pm responded exactly the way I thought they would, immature & childish.

    Linda’s tantrums made you feel good but it ended any hope of her accomplishing anything on the council.

  15. Goldie
    July 30, 2011 at 2:24 pm

    “Linda’s tantrums made you feel good but it ended any hope of her accomplishing anything on the council.” This is nothing but empty ridicule HiFi. It’s a ploy to make people feel bad or like they are less than you. It is a request to shut up and go away. Linda’s letter was a request to come forward and speak up. There is no tantrum in her letter at all. It is an invitation to participate in our democracy, our future.

  16. Plain Jane
    July 30, 2011 at 2:30 pm

    HiFi doesn’t care about democracy. He has stated many times he believes the rich should make our decisions. He has the typical American peasant delusions that he will one day make it to the top of the pile and wants to make sure no one tears down the pile before he gets there.

  17. Anonymous
    July 30, 2011 at 3:34 pm

    A “clique” is an excellent term.

  18. High Finance
    July 30, 2011 at 3:47 pm

    Does anybody here understand how a mature councilman could register their displeasure without burning every freakin’ bridge to everybody else on the council ?

    The tantrum dear Goldie was in her public accusations in the media against all her fellow council members. Her tantrum in this My Word piece is in her accusations against her former board members who spoke up in defense of Tyson. Reread the letter and with a critical eye this time.

    PJ, your silly post at 2.30pm just goes to show how far gone your reasoning abilities are.

  19. High Finance
    July 30, 2011 at 3:57 pm

    So nobody else will post anything critique of Atkin’s piece it leaves me the only one to do it.

    She accuses the current & former council members of trying to stifle dissent when they are doing nothing of the kind. There are mature ways of dissenting without the nasty outbursts that Mz Atkins persists in.

    She says she wouldn’t “treat badly, council members or staff with hom I’ve had disagreements”. Yet that is exactly what she has & is doing.

    She downplays her role in this public disagreement, saying only that she was “encouraging the citizens to express themselves. Never mentioning she had a large role in the failed petition gathering process.

    She accuses them of “disregard of your concerns”. She then accuses her fellow council members of bringing negative changes & closed communication. She accuses them of acting in a way that the “overwhelming” number of citizens disagree with without even any evidence of same. She accuses them of “dismissing their complaints as unimportant”.

    She seems to be unable to disagree with their actions without casting evil intent on their part. Much like PJ does in almost every one of her 876 daily posts here.

  20. High Finance
    July 30, 2011 at 4:20 pm

    Excuse the typos. My screen seems to be messing up here whenever I post more than four or five lines.

  21. Anonymous
    July 30, 2011 at 4:42 pm

    High Finance and some others are lost in the middle part of the last century. They just ain’t used to those smart and vocal women that think for themselves and use their brain. You know— women that don’t just follow the herd or some man because he is a man just like a 1950s housewife.

  22. Ben
    July 30, 2011 at 5:08 pm

    To be effective in public office, you must bring others to your view on an issue, because being a board member means that you only accomplish something if you can gain support from our fellow board members. if you goal is to be an outside fighter, you will certainly get press and blog reports, but you will push other decision makers away from you and therefore make your ability to affect decisions even more remote. If you feel that the board does not have public support and you wish to bring about pubic sentiment to get new board members, then you will raise issues and get press and blog comments. Unfortunately that is a tool used by a board member who has an election after the next round of elections for their board.
    So if Linda’s goal is to bring others to her position, her tactics are a failure at best. If her goal is to change the balance on the board, then her tactic may just backfire since she is up for election and the people she is fighting won with a large majority. It seems that she wants to be an outside fighter and enjoys the role and therefore will be inneffective in office.

  23. Plain Jane
    July 30, 2011 at 5:22 pm

    If they all have to speak with one voice, why not just have a dictator, Ben? The derision seems to arise from the silly idea that she spoke out stupidly, believing everyone would suddenly have an epiphany and agree with her. I’m sure Ms. Atkins doesn’t need to hear from you or me about the risks she takes in standing up for constituents who don’t own most of Eureka. That she does so knowing the risks only increases the respect she deserves for her courage, agree with her or not.

  24. pattycakes
    July 30, 2011 at 5:53 pm

    What the Atkins critics don’t quite get is that what was childish and immaturish in the first place was the letter by Team Arkley. Why bother to criticize a council member who isn’t even around anymore-Larry- unless you are still carrying a grudge. Why bother to trash Linda because, as a minority of one, she certainly can’t affect the puppets’ votes.
    It seems pretty obvious that they are afraid Linda’s actions will find fertile ground among citizens already pissed about some of this council’s actions.
    If they were smart they would have just ignored her, but now they are actually giving credence to what she is doing and saying because they obviously feel they have to challenge it, even if it makes them look less than professional, grownup and mature.

  25. July 30, 2011 at 5:58 pm

    Hello? This is about spot zoning and the right of some thereof to petition and win their required land use designations at will.

    Eureka has granted about six dozen such reclassifications since 1980. Prior to 1980? None. And now they want the county, too. Rex calls it the “change Eureka needs”. At least, I guess that’s what he means.

  26. July 30, 2011 at 5:59 pm

    The Eight don’t want anyone looking there way, and Linda is so…inconvenient.

  27. pattycakes
    July 30, 2011 at 6:01 pm

    Dave Short commenting on Linda’s piece at the TS said it best:
    When you’re getting flak, you’re over the target.”

    Linda was not only over it, she dropped a bomb right on it.

  28. Anonymous
    July 30, 2011 at 6:39 pm

    Obviously the old guard is concerned about Atkins and her ability to excite the liberal and less-connected portions of Eureka. If they weren’t there would not be such an immediate reaction to her My Word by the people posting here and by HiFi (who protests way too much).
    A good friend who has paid very little attention to this issues told me this morning, “wow, it’s nice to see someone take the high road”. Notice that Atkins didn’t point fingers at specific individuals (like the other My Word piece did) and she didn’t try to deflect by talking about past city council members (the way the other My Word piece did) or other issues such as the Balloon Track (the way the other MyWord piece did).
    The Chamber/Arkley crowd is obviously worried. Atkins is capable of holding her own and inviting in a lot of people who normally don’t have their voices heard. Perhaps many of us should go to the next council meeting and ask why we don’t have a Marina Center Now!

  29. Anonymous
    July 30, 2011 at 6:44 pm

    “It seems that she wants to be an outside fighter and enjoys the role and therefore will be inneffective in office.”

    How have the other council members been effective? It get the impression Lance and Marian mainly show up and read their packet as the meeting progresses. Name one “effective” thing the four have done since November – other than letting Tyson play out his vendetta.

  30. Not A Native
    July 30, 2011 at 6:56 pm

    Hey, I think pj has been channeling me today. Whatever the inspiration, keep calling out and pointing out the deceivers and misdirectors for what they are: neo-Calvinists who doggedly predate on others and then assert that their dominance is proof of their superiority. non carborundum illigitimi, baby

  31. Goldie
    July 30, 2011 at 6:59 pm

    They brought back adult sports, gave Swim Possible a years lease, said logs could be piled on the land by Washington street, fired Garr. oh! and decided to do some global planning for our cities future, to the tune of a million plus for studies. Oh! and the otter pool.

  32. Pitchfork
    July 30, 2011 at 7:13 pm

    Where’s freakin marina center? That was they’re big promise. Remember, it was the sinister Larry Glass that had stopped it or slowed it way down, some how. it’s been over seven months since measure N passed. Attacking Linda is just a diversion to hide there complete failure.

  33. Anonymous
    July 30, 2011 at 7:16 pm

    If Linda Atkins can keep this pace, she will inspire more turnout in 2012, and ensure her reelection.

    Despite protestations, the public loves and remembers controversy.

    Those obsessed with their historic council majority must always be concerned.

  34. insider
    July 30, 2011 at 7:22 pm

    (“…….other than letting Tyson play out his vendetta.”) The vendetta is playing out over at EPD as the witch hunt continues. The latest is the decision to make everyone by the old skool EPD uniforms. You know the ones the look like the old LAPD uniforms that is going to cost some of the younger officers over $600 to buy a couple of these retro uniforms. Mean while the crown Victoria’s are still sitting in the corp yard.

  35. Anonymous
    July 30, 2011 at 7:57 pm

    “If Linda Atkins can keep this pace, she will inspire more turnout in 2012, and ensure her reelection.”

    We’ll see – I’ve given up on trying to predict who will win these elections – certainly many on this blog were comfortable in presuming a progressive majority for the city council, and we all saw how that turned out.

    I think for every Repub Convert to Dem like Virginia Bass, there is (as Richard Marks aptly named them) a Greenocrat, posing as a Dem.

    Pitchfork, if you think the Marina Center is dead because seven months have gone by, you know nothing about the process. It may very well never get built, we likley won’t know for a couple of years.

  36. Anonymous
    July 30, 2011 at 9:10 pm

    It is good to see someone like Linda trying to buck the good boys. Look what a mess they have made of Eureka, ruling it all these years. Dragging it into the muck.

  37. The Monitor
    July 30, 2011 at 9:19 pm

    Yes hifi, your comments are amateurish and childish. grow up old boy. your rants are hardly worth reading. But I will say you are pretty consistent and predictable.
    I have known Linda for some time now and find her ideas a right on with a more progressive view of the world. I know, blasphemy for those falling off the right end of the scale. I just wish your talking points made more sense.

  38. Anonymous
    July 30, 2011 at 9:35 pm

    Linda doesn’t have the capacity to know anything!

  39. July 30, 2011 at 9:52 pm

    9:35 I hope you realize how frickin’ stupid you sound. There is always more than one way to run a railroad. We don’t always have to agree with trogdolites like you. Now, get back under your rock!

  40. Anonymous
    July 30, 2011 at 10:38 pm

    That is the trouble with Anon 9:35. Been in Humboldt too long most likely. Probably never seen a female with a brain. Probably never seen a man from here with a working brain either.

  41. Anonymous
    July 30, 2011 at 10:52 pm

    she’s an idiot, a complete idiot

    go hi fi go

  42. Anonymous
    July 30, 2011 at 11:26 pm

    Anon 10:52 – Is that all you got? I don’t think you’re helping Hi Fi’s case much

  43. July 31, 2011 at 7:06 am

    “If Linda Atkins can keep this pace, she will inspire more turnout in 2012, and ensure her reelection.”

    7:57 is correct. Voters can be fickle so there’s no way to predict the outcome of local elections.

    The problem Atkins and her supporters have is they think most people think as they do. Thus the “if more people turn out to vote, we’ll win…“, comments. It’s understandable, as most of us tend to hang with those that think along the same line as we do.

    Most of the people I run into on a day to day basis either don’t care one way or the other about Atkins, Jefferson School or Chief Nielsen, or are on the other side of the issue.

    Atkins biggest mistake seems to be aligning herself with the fringe left but thinking she’s representing the majority.

  44. Plain Jane
    July 31, 2011 at 7:33 am

    Says Fred from the far right fringes.

  45. tra
    July 31, 2011 at 7:35 am

    Fred,

    What makes you think you’re not just suffering from the same “confirmation bias” that you think Atkins is suffering from?

  46. July 31, 2011 at 7:35 am

    Yeah, I am.

  47. July 31, 2011 at 7:56 am

    My comment at 7:35 was in reply to PJ.

    Perhaps I am guilty of confirmation bias. I suppose we’ll see come next election.

    I’m actually a bit unique, though, in that I don’t really have the regular circle of friends and acquaintances most people do. Most of my communication with others is just people I may run into throughout the day. Oh, and the blogs.

    I wish I could say I had a group I hang with, but I don’t.

  48. Mitch
    July 31, 2011 at 8:03 am

    “You know the ones the look like the old LAPD uniforms that is going to cost some of the younger officers over $600 to buy a couple of these retro uniforms. “

    EPD officers have to buy their uniforms? There’s no uniform allowance?

  49. tra
    July 31, 2011 at 8:09 am

    I don’t really have the regular circle of friends and acquaintances most people do. Most of my communication with others is just people I may run into throughout the day. Oh, and the blogs.

    Really? That seems kind of sad to me.

  50. Plain Jane
    July 31, 2011 at 8:21 am

    If there is a uniform allowance paid by the taxpayers, does that make it less wasteful, Mitch? Makes me wonder who has an interest in the uniform shop.

  51. July 31, 2011 at 9:22 am

    Really? That seems kind of sad to me.

    Depending on my mood, it seems like either a blessing or a curse.

  52. July 31, 2011 at 9:39 am

    If there is a uniform allowance paid by the taxpayers, does that make it less wasteful, Mitch? Makes me wonder who has an interest in the uniform shop.

    It could be a greed issue, but I bet it has more to do with undoing anything Nielsen did.

  53. July 31, 2011 at 9:53 am

    If you are an elected official. it is not who you know but what you know–you work for the public to achieve the common good. Period Raging Granny

  54. Anonymous
    July 31, 2011 at 9:59 am

    Insider?

    What is wrong with a professional uniform? I would have thought many of you “left of center” types would oppose the more military sytle fatique uniforms that became the standard with King Garr’s reign. In truth, with King Garr there ended up with no standard uniform. Nielsen allowed what you call the old “LAPD” traditional police uniforms, the fatigues, and the nylon suits (akerman suits) that were supposed to be for foul weather. The Akerman suits ended up being worn whenever the individual felt like it (too lazy or to big a behind to get into the regular uniform). When each individual can mix and match what uniform they wear it ceases to be a real uniform.

    One would think that citizens would appreciate a more professional appearing police force, kind of like if you look professional you’re more likely to act professional?

    If you check around you might find that the “LAPD” style uniform is the standard of many top notch law enforcment agencies in America, a long way from “retro”.

    All in all Ms Atkins has made it clear she thinks she should be queen, or fuhrer. With her comments she will have a difficult time dealing with the council, the mayor, and the city manager in any type of effective way.

    Just a few thoughts from a different point of view.

  55. High Finance
    July 31, 2011 at 11:04 am

    Ben at 5.08pm said it better than I did. Any mature, experienced council member would know that Ben is 100% right in that post.

    But we conservatives want to thank you lefties for failing to understand that simple point. We are depending on you to keep up your hysterics. You will turn off even more voters and will assure our win in Nov 2012. Atkins days as a council member are drawing to a close.

  56. July 31, 2011 at 11:05 am

    King Garr’s reign…Ms Atkins has made it clear she thinks she should be queen

    You are obviously the joker.

  57. Anonymous
    July 31, 2011 at 11:19 am

    Everybody likes to insult everybody else. That’s what is so entertaining about this blog.

    But WTF is a trogdolite?

  58. pattycakes
    July 31, 2011 at 12:05 pm

    In life, in politics, and in this blog, too, people are more interested in furthering their own viewpoints than in listening to anyone elses. While you are reading a post or conversing in person, your thoughts are on what YOU are going to say next, not on what someone else is saying now. I have found very few exceptions to this, and fewer still in Eureka.

  59. July 31, 2011 at 12:38 pm

    “Trogdolite?” Who knows….
    But there is “troglodytes” who have something to do with Evolution Theory…..but is most famous for the song..
    “Bertha Butt, One of the Butt-Sisters”
    Ah yes, you just don’t get music like that anymore…..
    “….gotta find a woman, gotta find a woman, gotta find a woman…….”
    Pure gold, baby.

  60. Anonymous
    July 31, 2011 at 12:48 pm

    Oh HH you are soo funny! But in reality a couple of posters are right. Atkins way of ………. expressing herself doesn’t score points with the majority of people (includes VOTERS). Maybe because you know her, like her you don’t she it. She comes off as an angry, bitter, loadmouth AH bully.

    And that’s just an observation, not a joke.

  61. July 31, 2011 at 1:13 pm

    Poor Anonymous has skin made of wet paper.

  62. Eric Kirk
    July 31, 2011 at 2:14 pm

    Excellent letter.

  63. Anonymous
    July 31, 2011 at 2:15 pm

    Irony – Anon 12:48 appear to know what the “majority of people” are thinking without talking to all of them.
    Did you think the majority would vote for Kuhnel and Manns rather than Newman?
    The people I talked with thought Atkins showed considerable restraint in her My Word piece by not allowing the Arkley crew to pull her into the mud. She simply said it is her duty to speak up when she disagrees and to represent constituents that don’t appear to be represented by the other council members. Note that she didn’t name past council members or go off on the various topics she disagrees with (as they did in the other My Word) .
    Of course, I don’t know if the people I speak to represent the majority.

  64. Anonymous
    July 31, 2011 at 2:26 pm

    My ad for the next city council election:
    “Remember the ‘bunch’ who told us they’d bring in jobs and clean up blight?’ What did they really do? (Show picture of balloon track and stores closing, followed by the current unemployment rate).
    1. Decide to NOT help revitalize a community (show Jefferson School work day).
    2. Fire a popular police chief (smiling picture of Garr with citizens). 3. Encourage big box stores (photo in progress).
    4. Used tax dollars to subsidize Chamber of Commerce events (show a chamber drink up).
    5. And they helped to build an otter pond.
    If you think Eureka can be more than a place for big boxes and otters, vote for….”

  65. High Finance
    July 31, 2011 at 2:29 pm

    The “people you talked to” are not a majority of Eurekans. Otherwise Neeley/Glass/Vallee would not have been slaughtered at the polls last November.

  66. Anonymous
    July 31, 2011 at 2:35 pm

    That is precisely the point 12:48. Atkins expresses herself unlike many women living in the dark ages of Humboldt. There are several simpering women that speak, they bow and scrape not wanting too cause any commotion whatsoever. Really reminds one of the repressed stereotypical 1950s housewife. Watch the council meetings sometime and get an eyeful.

  67. July 31, 2011 at 2:36 pm

    Whatever happened to “Marina Center now!”?

  68. The Monitor
    July 31, 2011 at 3:03 pm

    What is it with the right these days? They seem to have lost the ability to debate and would rather use smear tactics and crass comments than to talk issues. Believe it or not republicans don’t own the world yet and they have not enslaved the democrats and stopped our ability to discuss the issues of the day. Mean spirited back biting only shows your unwillingness to straight talk issues. School yard bullying is not an answer to anything, but does show that you have not risen above 7th grade tactics.

  69. pattycakes
    July 31, 2011 at 3:26 pm

    Latest polls show Americans are more disgusted with Republicans than they are with Democrats. I am sure the next elections will be similar to these last ones as far as incumbents getting ousted. Watch out Team Arkley.

  70. Anonymous
    July 31, 2011 at 4:00 pm

    Sometimes I respect HiFi’s alternate point of view. But he’s really full of sh**t to say anyone got “slaughtered” in past elections.

    The progs got complacent, and even cocky, after the likes of Glass, LaVallee, Atkins, Kerigan, Lovelace, etc won seats. They too probably thought they were slaughtering the old guard (Arkley, Flemming, etc) and it would just continue into the following elections.

    The reality is a pretty evenly divided electorate and one that does not vote along party lines. They’re all Democrats, right? Since it is Humboldt County, you can always point out that the existing councils and boards did not produce the jobs they talked about in the last election
    I guess I shouldn’t bother, and let the HiFis go into the next election thinking they have it in the bag. Then they’ll wake up Wednesday morning and wonder what happened.

  71. 69er
    July 31, 2011 at 4:44 pm

    It looks as there are some out there that think those in charge should be able to create jobs from out of thin air. This area is better off than most as far as employment, doesn’t anyone listen or read of what is going on nationwide? Every time someone comes up with an idea for creating employment there is a rallying cry to put a stop to it due to it not being up to there approval. No i am not in favor of a Wal-Mart in Eureka, but will not be surprised to see one before long. Target was not especially wanted but it is there and seems to be doing well. I remember when K-Mart was bad mouthed and not wanted by the vocal.
    As for uniforms, yes, they should look professional on the job. Being allowed to dress as they please should not be tolerated.
    All in all it just looks like people need to let off steam and this is a good place to do that.

  72. Anonymous
    July 31, 2011 at 8:59 pm

    How about this moron, yes I’ve stooped to name calling, Glass and LaVallee lost by a significant margin?!

    Clowns to the left, Jokers to the right … here I am.

  73. High Finance
    August 1, 2011 at 8:33 am

    Try Smart Voter.Org

    Marian Brady ran against an incumbent city councilman, Larry Glass, the darling of the left SHE BEAT HIM BY FIFTEEN POINTS!.

    Frank Jager ran against a former Mayor and beat him by eight points!.

    Virgina Bass, disparaged by the left, ran against a long term incumbent Bonnie Neely AND BEAT HER BY ELEVEN POINTS. Bonnie also was the darling of the left.

    Nobody from the left even bothered to run against Lance Madsen who, despite Mouse’s lies to the contrary, received almost 97% of the vote.

    Yes, the left was slaughtered in city/county races in Eureka last year.

  74. The Big Picture
    August 1, 2011 at 9:07 pm

    “Slaughtered” in your dreams Hi-Liar.

    Over half the potential voters are either not registered or abstain!

    It takes immense courage to speak out against a corrupt good ol’ boy system. A corruption rarely reported by local media, hence, people still think supporting sprawl and big box developments is “conservative” when “radical” is more appropriate considering the massive unfunded public subsidies they require.

    Standing up firmly for herself against the Gang of Four won’t guarantee Atkin’s reelection. But, if she doesn’t, she won’t stand a chance.

    The Radical-Reich’s attacks against Atkin’s passionate, on-target, free-speech is good news.

  75. The Monitor
    August 1, 2011 at 10:28 pm

    Hi Liar, I like it. You need to find a way to include twisted. When the truth is not presented to the public before an election, you get the results mentioned above, in glowing terms, not glowing truth. Hood winked is a good term for it. Of course if you believe Hi Liar you believe only the left’s shit stinks. Do we have to rub the rights nose in it to show them the error of their ways? You know they would swear it was Chanel #5.

  76. High Finance
    August 2, 2011 at 9:36 am

    Monitor, I hope you keep posting. I hope you post everywhere. In fact if Linda Atkins doesn’t hire you as her campaign spokesman I will be glad to put you on my payroll and will put you in TV commercials endorsing her.

    For every time you open your mouth you will cost her votes.

  77. The Big Picture
    August 2, 2011 at 8:57 pm

    There’s no question Atkins is intelligent, courageous, and well-spoken at council meetings.

    Every time Hi-Gassbags hammer a courageous underdog, it builds more support for them.

    Thank you.

  78. High Finance
    August 6, 2011 at 2:52 pm

    “Atkins is intelligent, courageous, and well-spoken at council meetings.”

    I agree. Which makes her recent and very public tantrums all the more strange.

  79. Anonymous
    August 8, 2011 at 12:07 pm

    Hyperbole, sophistry, lies and personal insults from Hi-Liar are certainly not strange.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s